I still get emails from “that site” advertising this and that and, for the most part, I see them, delete them without reading past the subject line, and go on about my business but every now and then, I’ll get one that gets my attention – like the one I’m scribbling about.
The ad went on to say that if you wanna get a straight guy to fuck you, watch this video and learn how to find out how to make him interested and/or have him dick-deep in your ass – or something to that effect; I’d tell you exactly what it said… but I deleted it.
I saw this, laughed to myself, and even remembered that, oh, about two years ago, I’d read a bunch of postings/comments on what I thought as a pro-gay site where it seemed to me that the members were going out of their way to convince straight men that they should be gay and offering up tips and tricks to each other in order to seduce straight men into revealing their true, gay nature.
Now, I’m sure that ad was really an attempt to get gay men, who might really be head over heels about getting some straight cock to play with, to fork over some loot to watch a more of a video that may or may not be of any real value. Not saying that one couldn’t get a straight guy to give up the dick but if you think it’s easy and that straight guys are so… sex-focused that they’d violate every principle they believe in to fuck you in the ass, well, the only thing I can tell you is that you need to have your own head checked.
It is… plausible that a straight guy could be “curious” about getting with another dude; doesn’t mean he’s gonna actually go find out if it’s true that guys suck dick better than women or that a guy’s ass is better than fucking pussy. We can reasonable assume that there are “straight” guys participating in bro-jobs and doing some boning while maintaining that they’re still very much straight; there are guys out there getting more male ass and cock than most women are and they, too, insist that they’re straight.
Don’t even get me started on this again but think quacking ducks.
What has me scratching my head – and as it did a couple of years ago when I first started seeing this – is why are straight men being “targeted?” The only thing I can think of is that straight men are the “forbidden fruit” of the M2M world and it wouldn’t surprise me that when gay men fantasize, there’s a straight guy who’s prominent in those fantasies.
There’s a lot of porn out there where “straight” guys are somehow and magically convinced to either give up the dick or their ass by their gay – or supposedly “straight” acquaintance. Fiction and flights of fancy? Probably more truth than fact but one cannot ignore that a straight guy could find himself in need of some male attention if some shit lines up the right way and at the right time and, classically, if some booze is involved, ain’t no telling what might jump off.
I look at my own experiences with straight guys who’ve had reason to dip their toes into the M2M pool; some just ask about the possibilities – what is it like, does doing anything like that make one gay, etc.; some are at their wit’s end and they need release and a release that has nothing to do with self-pleasuring themselves and, sure, some guys had been curious for quite some time and decided that now would be a good time to, um, stop being curious and find out what all the fuss is about.
Seriously… how do you think straight guys become bi guys? You’re not gonna just walk up to a guy who appears to be straight and ask to have sex with him. Well, you could ask… but how he might respond could be, hmm, interesting, to be nice about it. You could isolate a guy and attempt to seduce him… but that assumes that the guy is both naive and gullible and so much that he would have no clue or thought that homey is trying to get into his underwear in some way. Straight guys are straight… they’re not that stupid and if they did go along with the seduction, it’s because they thought it would be a good idea to do so.
See, out of necessity, guys have to learn the art of seduction if they wanna get laid and, duh, some are better than others at it. It stands to reason that someone who practices the art of seduction would – or should – know when someone is trying to seduce them. It also stands to reason that if it doesn’t always work successfully with women, um, it’s not going to be all that successful with, let’s say, other practitioners of the art. I mean, I’ve had guys try to seduce me… and it was very damned obvious and now it’s just a matter of what they’re saying that I might find interesting enough to allow myself to be seduced or to just act as if I don’t know they’re trying to seduce me.
Still, even I’m not sure how one would go about seducing a true straight guy into doing something that, because of his principles, he’d never do. Just like all that stuff people put out there on how to successfully seduce women, it assumes that the object of seduction doesn’t become aware at some point what’s taking place… and if we can safely say that women aren’t that stupid and clueless, what makes someone think that men are?
Maybe it’s just me but seducing someone is all about convincing them that getting naked with you is not only a good idea but should they decide to go along with the proposition, they’re not gonna be making a mistake by doing so. It could be said or implied that, sure, women are “naturally” harder to seduce given how they think and feel about sex; therefore, since guys are hard-wired for sex and it’s always on their mind, it would be easier to get him to drop his shorts… uh, provided said guy really doesn’t have any objections to being sexually intimate with another man.
One problem in this – and one that’s been written about a lot – is that women feel… and men think (and despite what women might say to the contrary about that) so if you’re trying to seduce a guy, you should “attack” him with a progressive and logical argument toward why it would be good for him to pull his dick out so you can play with it. What you don’t know – or might not know – is what his brain is doing while you’re doing all of this; he’s hearing the logical arguments and arguments that are running up against his morality and a morality that might sound logical but is really emotionally based – it’s what he believes in that’s near and dear to the core of who he is.
So while getting a straight guy to give it up to you might be something that gets you drooling and painfully erect, it seems to me that unless the guy is already leaning in that direction, good luck trying to get him to give up his dick to you, let alone his ass. Yeah… we like sex; we like to fuck and we like having our dick sucked but even when a guy is curious about this, what he’s really thinking about is all the reasons why he shouldn’t go along with this and not so much the “sensible” and logical reasons why he should.
Guess which thing is gonna prevail unless there are mitigating circumstances in play?
I think this shit is funny. It’s not that a straight guy wouldn’t or couldn’t decide that getting with a dude would work and at least in that moment… but to think it’s easy to get him to give up the D? Patently ridiculous and more so if you really and truly know anything about men. We are notorious and even infamous horn-dogs but if a guy is very firmly in his mind heterosexual, nothing you’re gonna say or do – short of slipping him a Mickey – is gonna get him in your bed and with his cock stretching your asshole out of shape.
It’s not even that easy to get a guy who is into this to give it up and no matter how horny the dude is because, again, he’d be thinking of every reason why he shouldn’t do it and there are a lot of reasons why he shouldn’t and reasons that clash against those thoughts of why doing it would be a good idea, well, right up to the point when they agree and then it may occur to them that this wasn’t the smartest thing they’ve done today.